Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231595›Full record

ArticleEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2024

Identifying limitations to exercise with incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a scoping review.

Michaël Staes, Iwein Gyselinck, Kaatje Goetschalckx, Thierry Troosters, Wim Janssens

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex as a moderator of the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and depressive symptoms in older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Percentile-basedERJ open research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michaël StaesLaboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Iwein GyselinckLaboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-7228
Kaatje GoetschalckxResearch Unit Cardiovascular Imaging and Dynamics, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thierry TroostersClinical Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wim JanssensLaboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium wim.janssens@uzleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-2982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a comprehensive and invaluable assessment used to identify the mechanisms that limit exercise capacity. However, its interpretation remains poorly standardised. This scoping review aims to investigate which limitations to exercise are differentiated by the use of incremental CPET in literature and which criteria are used to identify them. We performed a systematic, electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus. All types of publications that reported identification criteria for at least one limitation to exercise based on clinical parameters and CPET variables were eligible for inclusion. 86 publications were included, of which 57 were primary literature and 29 were secondary literature. In general, at the level of the cardiovascular system, a distinction was often made between a normal physiological limitation and a pathological one. Within the respiratory system, ventilatory limitation, commonly identified by a low breathing reserve, and gas exchange limitation, mostly identified by a high minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope and/or oxygen desaturation, were often described. Multiple terms were used to describe a limitation in the peripheral muscle, but all variables used to identify this limitation lacked specificity. Deconditioning was a frequently mentioned exercise limiting factor, but there was no consensus on how to identify it through CPET. There is large heterogeneity in the terminology, the classification and the identification criteria of limitations to exercise that are distinguished using incremental CPET. Standardising the interpretation of CPET is essential to establish an objective and consistent framework.

Indexed as

Exercise TestExercise TolerancePredictive Value of TestsCardiorespiratory FitnessHumansLungOxygen ConsumptionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID39231595
PMCPMC11372471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.