Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232644›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Comparison of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for early prediction of septic shock in diabetic patients in Emergency Departments.

Wijittra Liengswangwong, Ranchana Siriwannabhorn, Sittichok Leela-Amornsin, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Pitsucha Sanguanwit, Chonthicha Duangsri, Nusara Kusonkhum, Parnthap Saelim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07249749 (Factors Associated With Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit From the Orinoco Region. An Observational Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07249749 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Factors Associated With Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit From the Orinoco Region. An Observational Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsCritically Ill, Intensive Care (ICU), Intensive Care Medicine, MortalityArmsExposure factors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive value of NLMR, PLR, and ferritin in relation to SOFA, APACHE II, and SAPS II in sepsis patients.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Shock index and early warning score in liver cancer rupture shock.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wijittra LiengswangwongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-7088
Ranchana SiriwannabhornDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1201-2929
Sittichok Leela-AmornsinChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 111 Moo 14, Bang Pla, Bang Phli, Samut Prakarn, Thailand. sittichok.lee@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-7915
Chaiyaporn YuksenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-7176
Pitsucha SanguanwitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2250-6980
Chonthicha DuangsriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7579-5414
Nusara KusonkhumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6013-7493
Parnthap SaelimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4775-2299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a severe medical condition that can be life-threatening. If sepsis progresses to septic shock, the mortality rate increases to around 40%, much higher than the 10% mortality observed in sepsis. Diabetes increases infection and sepsis risk, making management complex. Various scores of screening tools, such as Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), are used to predict the severity or mortality rate of disease. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness and optimal cutoff points of these scores. We focused on the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes in the Emergency Department (ED).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to collect data on patients with diabetes. We collected prediction factors and MEWS, SOFA, SAPS II and APACHE II scores to predict septic shock in these patients. We determined the optimal cutoff points for each score. Subsequently, we compared the identified scores with the gold standard for diagnosing septic shock by applying the Sepsis-3 criteria.

resultsSystolic blood pressure (SBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pH, and lactate concentrations were significant predictors of septic shock (p < 0.001). The SOFA score performed well in predicting septic shock in patients with diabetes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the SOFA score was 0.866 for detection within 48 h and 0.840 for detection after 2 h of admission to the ED, with the optimal cutoff score of ≥ 6.

conclusionSBP, SpO2, GCS, pH, and lactate concentrations are crucial for the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes. The SOFA score is a superior predictor for the onset of septic shock in patients with diabetes compared with MEWS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores. Specifically, a cutoff of ≥ 6 in the SOFA score demonstrates high accuracy in predicting shock within 48 h post-ED visit and as early as 2 h after ED admission.

Indexed as

APACHEEarly Warning ScoreEmergency Service, HospitalOrgan Dysfunction ScoresShock, SepticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSimplified Acute Physiology ScoreDiabetesEmergency departmentScoreSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39232644
PMCPMC11376032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.