Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233521›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Engineering of Bioresorbable Polymers for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.

Monika Dobrzyńska-Mizera, Jagan Mohan Dodda, Xiaohua Liu, Monika Knitter, Reece N Oosterbeek, Pablo Salinas, Eduardo Pozo, Ana Marina Ferreira, Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Absorb® bioresorbable scaffold in "established" versus "off-label" coronary lesions: 5-year data from the GABI-R® registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monika Dobrzyńska-MizeraInstitute of Materials Technology, Polymer Division, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Jagan Mohan DoddaNew Technologies - Research Centre (NTC), University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Pilsen, 30100, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-3894
Xiaohua LiuChemical and Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Missouri, 1030 Hill Street, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.
Monika KnitterInstitute of Materials Technology, Polymer Division, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Reece N OosterbeekDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ, UK.
Pablo SalinasDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo PozoDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Marina FerreiraSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK.
Emmanuel Rotimi SadikuTshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Polymer Division & Institute for Nano Engineering Research (INER), Pretoria West Campus, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004634Poznan University of Technology 0613/SBAD/4820Poznan University of Technology 0613/SBAD/4888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, the recent advances in the development of resorbable polymeric-based biomaterials, their geometrical forms, resorption mechanisms, and their capabilities in various biomedical applications are critically reviewed. A comprehensive discussion of the engineering approaches for the fabrication of polymeric resorbable scaffolds for tissue engineering, drug delivery, surgical, cardiological, aesthetical, dental and cardiovascular applications, are also explained. Furthermore, to understand the internal structures of resorbable scaffolds, representative studies of their evaluation by medical imaging techniques, e.g., cardiac computer tomography, are succinctly highlighted. This approach provides crucial clinical insights which help to improve the materials' suitable and viable characteristics for them to meet the highly restrictive medical requirements. Finally, the aspects of the legal regulations and the associated challenges in translating research into desirable clinical and marketable materials of polymeric-based formulations, are presented.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsPolymersTissue EngineeringAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersclinical challengesdrug deliveryimplantsmedical imagingpolymer matricesresorbable biomaterialstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39233521
PMCPMC11616265

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.