Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233690›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024

Concepts and applications of digital twins in healthcare and medicine.

Kang Zhang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Daniel T Baptista-Hon, Yuanxu Gao, Xiaohong Liu, Eric Oermann, Sheng Xu, Shengwei Jin, Jian Zhang, Zhuo Sun and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Digital Twin Technology In Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kang ZhangNational Clinical Eye Research Center, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Hong-Yu ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02138, USA.
Daniel T Baptista-HonInstitute for AI in Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China.
Yuanxu GaoDepartment of Big Data and Biomedical AI, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100000, China.
Xiaohong LiuCancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
Eric OermannNYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Sheng XuDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Shengwei JinInstitute for Clinical Data Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Jian ZhangNational Clinical Eye Research Center, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Zhuo SunInstitute for Advanced Study on Eye Health and Diseases, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Yun YinFaculty of Business and Health Science Institute, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.
Ronald M RazmiZoi Capital, New York, NY 10013, USA.
Alexandre LoupyUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, 75015 Paris, France.
Stephan BeckCancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
Jia QuNational Clinical Eye Research Center, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Joseph WuCardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Standford, CA 94305, USA.
International Consortium of Digital Twins in Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital twin (DT) is a concept widely used in industry to create digital replicas of physical objects or systems. The dynamic, bi-directional link between the physical entity and its digital counterpart enables a real-time update of the digital entity. It can predict perturbations related to the physical object's function. The obvious applications of DTs in healthcare and medicine are extremely attractive prospects that have the potential to revolutionize patient diagnosis and treatment. However, challenges including technical obstacles, biological heterogeneity, and ethical considerations make it difficult to achieve the desired goal. Advances in multi-modal deep learning methods, embodied AI agents, and the metaverse may mitigate some difficulties. Here, we discuss the basic concepts underlying DTs, the requirements for implementing DTs in medicine, and their current and potential healthcare uses. We also provide our perspective on five hallmarks for a healthcare DT system to advance research in this field.

Identifiers

PMID39233690
PMCPMC11368703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.