Evidence mapPaperPMID 39233975Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Influence of Obesity on Cholecystectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches.

Nay Phone Hlyan, Lara Alsadoun, Muhammad Mustaneer Ul Hassan, Muhammad Junaid Cheema, Asghar Ali, Abdullah Shehryar, Abdur Rehman, Muhammad Usman Fareed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nay Phone HlyanGeneral Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Lara AlsadounTrauma and Orthopaedics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, GBR.
Muhammad Mustaneer Ul HassanGeneral Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Junaid CheemaGeneral Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Asghar AliGeneral Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Abdullah ShehryarInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Abdur RehmanSurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Usman FareedSurgery, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy, analyzing data from five key studies. The review explores differences in operative times, complication rates, conversion rates, and recovery times among obese patients undergoing these surgical procedures. The findings indicate that while laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients tends to require longer operative times, it does not significantly increase complication rates compared to open cholecystectomy. However, the risk of conversion to open surgery is modestly elevated. The review highlights the necessity for surgical guidelines to adapt to the challenges posed by obesity, recommending advanced training and innovative technologies to improve surgical outcomes. Limitations such as study design heterogeneity and variability in defining obesity underscore the need for further research. This review contributes to optimizing surgical care strategies and improving patient outcomes in the growing demographic of obese surgical patients.

Indexed as

complication rateslaparoscopic cholecystectomyobesityopen cholecystectomyoperative timesurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39233975
PMCPMC11372850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.