Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Comprehensive hepatotoxicity prediction: ensemble model integrating machine learning and deep learning.

Muhammad Zafar Irshad Khan, Jia-Nan Ren, Cheng Cao, Hong-Yu-Xiang Ye, Hao Wang, Ya-Min Guo, Jin-Rong Yang, Jian-Zhong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Zafar Irshad KhanCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jia-Nan RenCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng CaoCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hong-Yu-Xiang YeCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hao WangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ya-Min GuoCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jin-Rong YangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jian-Zhong ChenCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chemicals may lead to acute liver injuries, posing a serious threat to human health. Achieving the precise safety profile of a compound is challenging due to the complex and expensive testing procedures. In silico approaches will aid in identifying the potential risk of drug candidates in the initial stage of drug development and thus mitigating the developmental cost. Methods: In current studies, QSAR models were developed for hepatotoxicity predictions using the ensemble strategy to integrate machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms using various molecular features. A large dataset of 2588 chemicals and drugs was randomly divided into training (80%) and test (20%) sets, followed by the training of individual base models using diverse machine learning or deep learning based on three different kinds of descriptors and fingerprints. Feature selection approaches were employed to proceed with model optimizations based on the model performance. Hybrid ensemble approaches were further utilized to determine the method with the best performance. Results: The voting ensemble classifier emerged as the optimal model, achieving an excellent prediction accuracy of 80.26%, AUC of 82.84%, and recall of over 93% followed by bagging and stacking ensemble classifiers method. The model was further verified by an external test set, internal 10-fold cross-validation, and rigorous benchmark training, exhibiting much better reliability than the published models. Conclusion: The proposed ensemble model offers a dependable assessment with a good performance for the prediction regarding the risk of chemicals and drugs to induce liver damage.

Indexed as

deep learningensemble modelhepatotoxicitymachine learningmolecular fingerprints

Identifiers

PMID39234116
PMCPMC11373136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.