Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234394›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment prognosis of esophageal carcinosarcoma.

Jiangfeng Shen, Kaijin Lu, Fuxing Liu, Xia Chen, Quan Chen, Bingbing Wu, Hailan Wang, Pengfei Ge, Guang Han, Fei Wang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection for large esophageal carcinosarcoma-Is R0 resection curative enough!Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jiangfeng Shen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Kaijin Lu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Fuxing LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Xia ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Quan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Bingbing WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Hailan WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Pengfei GeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Guang HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Fei WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Pei YinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Weiguang JiaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Yiming ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Pengcheng WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Fei SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carcinosarcoma is a rare esophageal tumor, accounting for approximately 0.27-2.8% of malignant esophageal tumors. This study aims to investigate the clinical pathological characteristics, surgical treatment outcomes, and analysis of prognostic factors in esophageal carcinosarcoma (ECS). Methods: Clinical data from sixteen patients diagnosed with esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma who underwent surgical interventions were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological features, treatment modalities, and postoperative outcomes were systematically examined. Results: Out of the 1261 patients who underwent surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, 16 cases were pathologically confirmed as carcinosarcoma. Among them, two underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, six received postoperative chemotherapy. Carcinosarcomas predominantly occurred in the middle (43.75%) and lower (50%) segments of the esophagus. Among the 16 cases, 10 presented as polypoid, 4 as ulcerative, and 2 as medullary types. Microscopic examination revealed coexistence and transitional transitions between sarcomatous and carcinoma components. Pathological staging showed 5 cases in stage T1, 2 in stage T2, and 9 in stage T3, with lymph node metastasis observed in 8 cases (50%). TNM staging revealed 2 cases in stage I, 9 in stage II, and 5 in stage III. The overall 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were 86.67%, 62.5%, and 57.14%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that pathological N staging influenced survival rates, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that pathological N staging was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: Carcinosarcoma is a rare esophageal tumor, accounting for approximately 0.27-2.8% of malignant esophageal tumors. Histologically, the biphasic pattern is a crucial diagnostic feature, although the carcinomatous component may not always be evident, especially in limited biopsies, leading to potential misclassification as pure sarcoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Despite its large volume and cellular atypia, carcinosarcoma carries a favorable prognosis. Complete surgical resection of the tumor and regional lymph node dissection is the preferred treatment approach for esophageal carcinosarcoma.

Indexed as

carcinosarcomaclinical pathologyesophageal cancerprognosis analysissurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID39234394
PMCPMC11371597

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.