Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235579›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2024

Nuclear Medicine Imaging Techniques in Glioblastomas.

Emirhan Harbi, Michael Aschner

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing the efficacy of VEGF inhibitors by co-inhibition of HIF in the treatment of glioblastoma.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emirhan HarbiDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. emirhanharbi41@gmail.com.
Michael AschnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastomas are the most common primary malignant grade 4 tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). The treatment and management of such tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach and nuclear medicine techniques play an important role in this process. Glioblastoma, which recurs despite current treatments and becomes resistant to treatments, is among the tumors with the lowest survival rate, with a survival rate of approximately 8 months. Currently, the standard treatment of glioblastoma is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection. There have been many recent advances in the field of Nuclear Medicine in glioblastoma. PET scans are critical in determining tumor localization, pre-surgical planning, evaluation of post-treatment response and detection of recurrence. Advances in the treatment of glioblastoma and a better understanding of the biological characteristics of the disease have contributed to the development of nuclear medicine techniques. This review, in addition to other studies, is intended as a general imaging summary guide and includes some new expressions discovered in glioblastoma. This review discusses recent advances in nuclear medicine in glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNuclear MedicineHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticalsGlioblastomaNuclear medicinePETTreatment response assessmentTumor imaging

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.