Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235674›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025

Comparison of the ability of different quantitative indices in

Tomohiro Sato, Setsu Sawai, Naokazu Shimada

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomohiro SatoDepartment of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. satot-rad@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1600-8854
Setsu SawaiDepartment of Neurology, Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital, 1273-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-0852, Japan.
Naokazu ShimadaDepartment of Radiology, Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital, 1273-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 260-0852, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBy imaging dopamine transporter (DAT) uptake in the striatum, MATERIALS AND

methodsDistribution volume ratio (DVR) and binding ratio (BR), measures of DAT uptake capacity, were measured by analyzing clinical

resultsThe caudate-to-occipital lobe, putamen-to-occipital lobe, and striatum-to-occipital lobe ratios (COR, POR, and SOR, respectively) on DVR and POR and SOR on BR were significantly lower in dNDD than in non-dNDD, with areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.941-0.960, showing high diagnostic accuracy for dNDD. However, the AUC of COR on BR was 0.839, indicating lower diagnostic performance. SBR had an AUC of 0.921, while SUVmax and SUVmean had AUCs of 0.906 and 0.900, respectively. Although striatal asymmetry on both DVR and BR exhibited AUCs of 0.728 and 0.734 and asymmetry on SBR showed an AUC of 0.757, the ratio-based DAT quantitative indices were superior. There were strong positive correlations of DVR with BR, DVR with SBR or SUVmax, BR with SBR or SUVmax, and SBR with SUVmax.

conclusionCOR, POR, and SOR on DVR and POR and SOR on BR were the most useful DAT quantitative indices. These indices can be compared with SBR and SUV, suggesting that comprehensive evaluation improves the diagnostic accuracy of dNDD.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanesAgedAged, 80 and overBrainDiagnosis, DifferentialDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and Specificity2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsRadiopharmaceuticalsTropanes123I-FP-CITDVRParkinson’s diseaseSBRSUV

Identifiers

PMID39235674
PMCPMC11717878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.