ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Comparative analysis of the complete mitogenomes of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organellar genome evolution in Camellia tianeensis (Theaceae): comparative insights into RNA editing, codon usage, and DNA transfer between chloroplast and mitochondrion.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Camellia sinensis var. assamica 'Hainan Dayezhong', endemic to Hainan Province, China.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Assembly and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of an endemic Camellia species of China, Camellia tachangensis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Complete sequencing of the mitochondrial genome of tea plantFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Analysis of the mitochondrial genome of theFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Among cultivated tea plants ( Methods: Using a combination of Illumina and Nanopore data for the first time. Comparison between CSS and CSA mitogenomes revealed a huge heterogeneity. Results: The number of the repetitive sequences was proportional to the mitogenome size and the repetitive sequences dominated the intracellular gene transfer segments (accounting for 88.7%- 92.8% of the total length). Predictive RNA editing analysis revealed that there might be significant editing in NADH dehydrogenase subunit transcripts. Codon preference analysis showed a tendency to favor A/T bases and T was used more frequently at the third base of the codon. ENc plots analysis showed that the natural selection play an important role in shaping the codon usage bias, and Ka/Ks ratios analysis indicated Discussion: Altogether, this investigation provided an insight into evolution and phylogeny relationship of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.