ReviewDrug delivery2024
Bone scaffolds-based localized drugs delivery for osteosarcoma: current status and future perspective.
Review in Drug delivery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liposomal multimodal theranostics for bone disorders: from rational responsive delivery and biomimetic strategies to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Bifunctional scaffolds: strategic bridges coordinating osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in biomaterials for osteosarcoma treatment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Scaffolds and Drug Delivery Systems in Treatment of Osteoporosis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Dual Approach with Organoid and CRISPR Screening Reveals ERCC6 as a Determinant of Cisplatin Resistance in Osteosarcoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Establishment and characterization of NCC-OS2-C1: a novel patient-derived cell line of osteosarcoma.Human cell · 2025Article
- Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A common malignant bone neoplasm in teenagers is Osteosarcoma. Chemotherapy, surgical therapy, and radiation therapy together comprise the usual clinical course of treatment for Osteosarcoma. While Osteosarcoma and other bone tumors are typically treated surgically, however, surgical resection frequently fails to completely eradicate tumors, and in turn becomes the primary reason for postoperative recurrence and metastasis, ultimately leading to a high rate of mortality. Patients still require radiation and/or chemotherapy after surgery to stop the spread of the tumor and its metastases, and both treatments have an adverse influence on the body's organ systems. In the postoperative management of osteosarcoma, bone scaffolds can load cargos (growth factors or drugs) and function as drug delivery systems (DDSs). This review describes the different kinds of bone scaffolds that are currently available and highlights key studies that use scaffolds as DDSs for the treatment of osteosarcomas. The discussion also includes difficulties and perspectives regarding the use of scaffold-based DDSs. The study may serve as a source for outlining efficient and secure postoperative osteosarcoma treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.