ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
Detection of genomic variants by genome sequencing in foetuses with central nervous system abnormalities.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal genomic sequencing: Navigating uncertainty.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Application of trio-based whole-exome sequencing in fetal ultrasound anomalies: a single-center retrospective study of 454 cases.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveClinical validity of genome sequencing (GS) (>30×) has been preliminarily verified in the post-natal setting. This study is to investigate the potential utility of trio-GS as a prenatal test for diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) anomalies.
methodsWe performed trio-based GS on a prospective cohort of 17 foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Single nucleotide variation (SNV), small insertion and deletion (Indel), copy number variation (CNV), structural variant (SV), and regions with absence of heterozygosity (AOH) were analyzed and classified according to ACMG guidelines.
resultsTrio-GS identified diagnostic findings in 29.4% (5/17) of foetuses, with pathogenic variants found in
conclusionGS demonstrates its feasibility in providing genetic diagnosis for foetal CNS abnormalities and shows the potential to expand the application to foetuses with other ultrasound anomalies in prenatal diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.