ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2024
Uncertainty quantification of the pressure waveform using a Windkessel model.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty quantification for patient-specific domain in virtual aortic procedures: application to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Uncertainty quantification of the pressure waveform using a Windkessel model.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Windkessel (WK) model is a simplified mathematical model used to represent the systemic arterial circulation. While the WK model is useful for studying blood flow dynamics, it suffers from inaccuracies or uncertainties that should be considered when using it to make physiological predictions. This paper aims to develop an efficient and easy-to-implement uncertainty quantification method based on a local gradient-based formulation to quantify the uncertainty of the pressure waveform resulting from aleatory uncertainties of the WK parameters and flow waveform. The proposed methodology, tested against Monte Carlo simulations, demonstrates good agreement in estimating blood pressure uncertainties due to uncertain Windkessel parameters, but less agreement considering uncertain blood-flow waveforms. To illustrate our methodology's applicability, we assessed the aortic pressure uncertainty generated by Windkessel parameters-sets from an available in silico database representing healthy adults. The results from the proposed formulation align qualitatively with those in the database and in vivo data. Furthermore, we investigated how changes in the uncertainty of the Windkessel parameters affect the uncertainty of systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures. We found that peripheral resistance uncertainty produces the most significant change in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure uncertainties. On the other hand, compliance uncertainty considerably modifies the pulse pressure standard deviation. The presented expansion-based method is a tool for efficiently propagating the Windkessel parameters' uncertainty to the pressure waveform. The Windkessel model's clinical use depends on the reliability of the pressure in the presence of input uncertainties, which can be efficiently investigated with the proposed methodology. For instance, in wearable technology that uses sensor data and the Windkessel model to estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressures, it is important to check the confidence level in these calculations to ensure that the pressures accurately reflect the patient's cardiovascular condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.