Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240109›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024

Rapidly Degrading Hydrogels to Support Biofabrication and 3D Bioprinting Using Cartilage Microtissues.

Gabriela S Kronemberger, Francesca D Spagnuolo, Aliaa S Karam, Kaoutar Chattahy, Kyle J Storey, Daniel J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela S KronembergerTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0953-221X
Francesca D SpagnuoloTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.
Aliaa S KaramTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.
Kaoutar ChattahyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.
Kyle J StoreyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.
Daniel J KellyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 R590, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-0992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of cellular spheroids, microtissues, and organoids as biological building blocks to engineer functional tissues and organs. Such microtissues are typically formed by the self-assembly of cellular aggregates and the subsequent deposition of a tissue-specific extracellular matrix (ECM). Biofabrication and 3D bioprinting strategies using microtissues may require the development of supporting hydrogels and bioinks to spatially localize such biological building blocks in 3D space and hence enable the engineering of geometrically defined tissues. Therefore, the aim of this work was to engineer scaled-up, geometrically defined cartilage grafts by combining multiple cartilage microtissues within a rapidly degrading oxidized alginate (OA) supporting hydrogel and maintaining these constructs in dynamic culture conditions. To this end, cartilage microtissues were first independently matured for either 2 or 4 days and then combined in the presence or absence of a supporting OA hydrogel. Over 6 weeks in static culture, constructs engineered using microtissues that were matured independently for 2 days generated higher amounts of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) compared to those matured for 4 days. Histological analysis revealed intense staining for GAGs and negative staining for calcium deposits in constructs generated by using the supporting OA hydrogel. Less physical contraction was also observed in constructs generated in the presence of the supporting gel; however, the remnants of individual microtissues were more observable, suggesting that even the presence of a rapidly degrading hydrogel may delay the fusion and/or the remodeling of the individual microtissues. Dynamic culture conditions were found to modulate ECM synthesis following the OA hydrogel encapsulation. We also assessed the feasibility of 3D bioprinting of cartilage microtissues within OA based bioinks. It was observed that the microtissues remained viable after extrusion-based bioprinting and were able to fuse after 48 h, particularly when high microtissue densities were used, ultimately generating a cartilage tissue that was rich in GAGs and negative for calcium deposits. Therefore, this work supports the use of OA as a supporting hydrogel/bioink when using microtissues as biological building blocks in diverse biofabrication and 3D bioprinting platforms.

Indexed as

AlginatesBioprintingCartilageHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringAnimalsExtracellular MatrixGlycosaminoglycansTissue ScaffoldsAlginatesGlycosaminoglycansHydrogels3D bioprintingbiofabricationcartilageextrusion-based printingfusionmicrotissuessupport hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID39240109
PMCPMC11480940

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.