SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2024
Efficacy and safety of intraoperative injection of mitomycin C during trabeculectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The use of contact lenses in patients with prior bleb-forming glaucoma surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Surgical Outcome of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C: A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Glaucoma in Thailand.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Sponge Application of Mitomycin C vs Sub-Tenon Injection in Trabeculectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTrabeculectomy, a primary surgical treatment for glaucoma, often employs mitomycin C (MMC) to reduce scar formation and improve surgical outcomes. However, the optimal application method of MMC, whether by injection or sponge, remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare injectable and sponge-based MMC application in terms of efficacy and safety, focusing on various clinical outcomes in glaucoma patients.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, Chinese biomedical literature database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Library was done for eligible studies that report data of glaucoma patients who were administered MMC by injection or sponge application during trabeculectomy. Outcomes of interest included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, bleb appearance grading (height, extent, vascularity), use of anti-glaucoma medications, and rates of complete success, qualified success, and failure. Data were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI). The random-effects inverse-variance model with DerSimonian-Laird estimate of tau
resultsA total of 15 studies with 1276 participants were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in IOP reduction between patients treated by MMC injection and sponge application (WMD = - 0.434). Significant differences were observed in bleb appearance grading scores for height (WMD = - 0.170) and extent (WMD = 0.174), with substantial heterogeneity. The use of anti-glaucoma medications was significantly lower in the injection group (WMD = - 0.274). However, there were no significant differences in the rates of complete success, qualified success, and failure. The study demonstrated moderate to high heterogeneity across various outcomes.
conclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that while both injection and sponge methods of MMC application during trabeculectomy were equally effective for IOP reduction, they differ in their impact on bleb morphology and postoperative medication requirement. The findings highlight the need for individualized treatment approaches in glaucoma surgery, taking into account the specific needs and characteristics of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39240391What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.