Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240566›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes in High-Risk Populations: 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Stephen T Higgins, Stacey C Sigmon, Jennifer W Tidey, Sarah H Heil, Diann E Gaalema, Dustin C Lee, Michael J DeSarno, Elias M Klemperer, Katherine E Menson, Patricia A Cioe and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04090879 phase2completednot on this map

Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations: Affective Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrown UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled326ConditionsTobacco Use DisorderArmsEither normal nicotine content cigarettes (15.8mg/g) or reduced nicotine content cigarettes (0.4mg/g), E-Cigarettes
NCT04092101 phase2completednot on this map

Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations: Opioid Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VermontRan2020 to 2023Enrolled326ConditionsTobacco Use DisorderArmsCigarettes with varying nicotine content, E-Cigarettes
NCT04092387 nacompletednot on this map

Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations: Women of Reproductive Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VermontRan2020 to 2023Enrolled326ConditionsTobacco Use DisorderArmsVarying the nicotine content of cigarettes, E-Cigarettes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. E-Liquid Flavor Availability Significantly Affects Cigarette and E-Liquid Purchasing in an Experimental Marketplace Simulating a Low Nicotine Product Standard.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stephen T HigginsUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Stacey C SigmonUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Jennifer W TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Sarah H HeilUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Diann E GaalemaUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Dustin C LeeBehavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael J DeSarnoUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Elias M KlempererUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Katherine E MensonUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Patricia A CioeCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Shirley PlucinskiUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Rhiannon C WileyUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Eva OrrUniversity of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, Burlington.

Funding

University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54DA036114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2018 to 2022
$19.4M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP30GM149331 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Stephen T Higgins · 2023 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036114NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM149331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prohibiting the sale of commonly preferred e-cigarette flavors (eg, fruity and sweet) to discourage use among youths poses a risk of diminishing efforts to decrease smoking in adults. Objective: To compare reductions in smoking achieved in adults with psychiatric conditions or lower educational level using very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes alone, combined with e-cigarettes limited to tobacco flavor (TF), or combined with e-cigarettes in participant-preferred flavors. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three randomized clinical trials were conducted for 16 weeks from October 2020 through November 2023 at the University of Vermont, Brown University, and Johns Hopkins University. Participants were adults who smoked daily and were not planning to quit in the next 30 days. These participants were from 3 at-risk populations: those with affective disorders, exemplifying mental illness; those with opioid use disorder, exemplifying substance use disorders; and females of reproductive age with a high-school education or less, exemplifying lower educational level. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental conditions: (1) normal nicotine content (NNC) cigarettes only; (2) VLNC cigarettes only; (3) VLNC cigarettes plus e-cigarettes with classic TF (hereafter, VLNC + TF); and (4) VLNC cigarettes plus e-cigarettes with preferred flavors (hereafter, VLNC + PF). Interventions: The NNC cigarettes contained 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco, the VLNC cigarettes contained 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco, the VLNC + TF had pods containing 5% nicotine by weight and only classic TF, and the VLNC + PF had pods containing 5% nicotine in 8 flavors (including fruity and sweet) from which participants selected 3 flavors. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean total cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) during week 16. Tobacco-related biomarkers were assessed, including total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), a tobacco-specific carcinogen. Results: A total of 326 participants (mean [SD] age, 40.09 [10.79] years; 243 females [74.5%]) from 3 randomized clinical trials were included. The VLNC cigarettes decreased total CPD, with least square (LS) means (SEMs) of 22.54 (1.59) in the NNC, 14.32 (1.32) in the VLNC, 11.76 (1.18) in the VLNC + TF, and 7.63 (0.90) in the VLNC + PF conditions. Each VLNC condition differed significantly from NNC, with an adjusted mean difference (AMD) of -8.21 (95% CI, -12.27 to -4.16; P < .001) in the VLNC, -10.78 (95% CI, -14.67 to -6.90; P < .001) in the VLNC + TF, and -14.91 (95% CI, -18.49 to -11.33; P < .001) in the VLNC + PF conditions. Participants in the VLNC + PF condition also decreased smoking below the VLNC and the VLNC + TF conditions (AMDs, -6.70 [95% CI, -9.84 to -3.55; P < .001] and -4.13 [95% CI, -7.05 to -1.21; P = .02]); the VLNC and VLNC + TF conditions did not differ significantly. Consistent with decreases in CPD, NNAL levels in the VLNC + PF condition were lower than in all other conditions, with AMDs (in pmol/mg creatinine) of -0.94 (95% CI, -1.41 to -0.47; P < .001) compared with the NNC condition, -0.47 (95% CI, -0.87 to -0.08; P = .03) compared with the VLNC condition, and -0.46 (95% CI, -0.83 to -0.10; P = .04) compared with the VLNC + TF condition. Conclusions and Relevance: These results provide further evidence that a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes has the potential to decrease smoking and tobacco-toxicant exposure in high-risk populations and that these effects may be enhanced when adults can access e-cigarettes in commonly preferred flavors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04092387, NCT04090879, NCT04092101.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdultFemaleFlavoring AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsFlavoring AgentsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID39240566
PMCPMC11380105

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.