Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242158›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effect of peanut butter supplementation on physical and cognitive functions in community-dwelling older adults: study protocol for a 6-month randomised controlled trial.

Jeew Hettiarachchi, Ilili Feyesa, Robin M Daly, Elena S George, Ekavi N Georgousopoulou, David Scott, Brenton J Baguley, Sze-Yen Tan

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeew HettiarachchiSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0995-9042
Ilili FeyesaSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Robin M DalySchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Elena S GeorgeSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1385-2371
Ekavi N GeorgousopoulouDiscipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
David ScottSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-1972
Brenton J BaguleySchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-8107
Sze-Yen TanSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia szeyen.tan@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-202X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAgeing is associated with physical and cognitive declines, which may be further exacerbated by poor nutrition. Nuts are energy and nutrient dense, and their consumption is associated with better physical and cognitive functions in older adults, but data from interventional studies are limited. This 6-month randomised controlled trial is designed to investigate the effects of consuming 43 g/day of peanut butter (equivalent to 1.5 servings of nuts) on physical function, including walking speed (primary outcome), standing and dynamic balance, upper and lower body strength, lower body power and endurance, and associated factors including muscle mass, cognitive function and DNA telomere length in community-dwelling older adults. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A total of 120 participants aged ≥65 years will be recruited and randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either the intervention group (n=60) that will receive individually packaged sealed containers containing 43 g of peanut butter to be consumed once daily for 6 months alongside habitual diet, or the control group (n=60) that will maintain their habitual diet. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 6 months. The primary outcome is walking speed assessed using the 4 m usual gait speed test. Secondary outcomes include other physical function assessments: standing balance, chair stand time, timed-up-and-go test and four-square step test; and hand grip and knee extensor muscle strength; cognitive function assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and trail making tests; body composition; nutritional status; and DNA telomere length from participants' buccal cell samples. Linear mixed models will be used to compare changes in outcomes between intervention and control groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol is approved by the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12622001291774. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR12622001291774.

Indexed as

ArachisCognitionIndependent LivingAgedDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPostural BalanceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWalking SpeedAgedGaitNUTRITION & DIETETICSRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39242158
PMCPMC11381714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.