Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Self-supervised learning of wrist-worn daily living accelerometer data improves the automated detection of gait in older adults.

Yonatan E Brand, Felix Kluge, Luca Palmerini, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Clemens Becker, Andrea Cereatti, Walter Maetzler, Basil Sharrack, Beatrix Vereijken, Alison J Yarnall and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing Step-Counting Algorithms for High-Resolution Wrist Accelerometry Data in Older Adults in the ARIC Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yonatan E BrandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Felix KlugeBiomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Luca PalmeriniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering Guglielmo Marconi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anisoara Paraschiv-IonescuLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clemens BeckerRobert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung, Stuttgart, Germany.
Andrea CereattiDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Walter MaetzlerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Basil SharrackDepartment of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Alison J YarnallTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Lynn RochesterTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Silvia Del DinTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Arne MullerBiomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Aron S BuchmanDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Or PerlmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. orperlman@tauex.tau.ac.il.

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEURAL RESERVE AND NEUROBIOLOGY IN AGINGR01AG017917 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2023
$43.3M
Impaired Gait in Older Adults: Pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and Related DisordersR01AG056352 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BUCHMAN, ARON S · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Thinking about walking: Can digital phenotyping of mobility improve the prediction of Alzheimer's dementia and inform on the pathologies and proteins contributing to this association?R01AG079133 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ARON S BUCHMAN · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Chiropractic Care for Episodic MigraineR01AT012228 · NCCIH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI RIST, PAMELA M., SICO, JASON JONATHON · 2023 to 2025
$1.8M
Innovative Medicines Initiative 820820NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079133NIH HHS R01AG017917NIH HHS R01AG056352NIH HHS R01AG79133NIH HHS R01AT012228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive gait impairment is common among aging adults. Remote phenotyping of gait during daily living has the potential to quantify gait alterations and evaluate the effects of interventions that may prevent disability in the aging population. Here, we developed ElderNet, a self-supervised learning model for gait detection from wrist-worn accelerometer data. Validation involved two diverse cohorts, including over 1000 participants without gait labels, as well as 83 participants with labeled data: older adults with Parkinson's disease, proximal femoral fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and healthy adults. ElderNet presented high accuracy (96.43 ± 2.27), specificity (98.87 ± 2.15), recall (82.32 ± 11.37), precision (86.69 ± 17.61), and F1 score (82.92 ± 13.39). The suggested method yielded superior performance compared to two state-of-the-art gait detection algorithms, with improved accuracy and F1 score (p < 0.05). In an initial evaluation of construct validity, ElderNet identified differences in estimated daily walking durations across cohorts with different clinical characteristics, such as mobility disability (p < 0.001) and parkinsonism (p < 0.001). The proposed self-supervised method has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for remote phenotyping of gait function during daily living in aging adults, even among those with gait impairments.

Indexed as

AccelerometryGaitSupervised Machine LearningActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWearable Electronic DevicesWristAccelerometerGaitMachine learningOlder adultsSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39242792
PMCPMC11379690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.