Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242877›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Fluid bolus increases plasma hyaluronan concentration compared to follow-up strategy without a bolus in oliguric intensive care unit patients.

Maija Serlo, Nina Inkinen, Päivi Lakkisto, Miia Valkonen, Anni Pulkkinen, Tuomas Selander, Ville Pettilä, Suvi T Vaara

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02860572 (Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Optimization Phase of Fluid Therapy in the Critically Ill), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02860572 nacompletednot on this map

Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Optimization Phase of Fluid Therapy in the Critically Ill (the RESPONSE Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled130ConditionsCritically Ill, Acute Kidney Injury, Sepsis, OliguriaArmsfollow-up without intervention, fluid bolus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maija SerloDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 320, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. maija.serlo@hus.fi.
Nina InkinenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Central Finland Health Care District, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Päivi LakkistoDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Miia ValkonenDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 320, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni PulkkinenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Central Finland Health Care District, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Tuomas SelanderScience Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Ville PettiläDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 320, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Suvi T VaaraDepartment of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 320, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 317061State funding for university-level health research TYH2016243, TYH2017241, TYH2018317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid therapy is a fundamental part of supportive therapy in critical care. However, it is also a suspected risk for endothelial glycocalyx degradation which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This secondary analysis of RESPONSE randomized trial compares the effect of follow-up strategy (FU) on endothelial biomarkers to that of 500 ml crystalloid fluid bolus (FB) in oliguric, hemodynamically optimized intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 130 adult subjects were enrolled in two Finnish ICUs from January 2017 to November 2020. Blood and urine samples of 63 patients in FU group and 67 patients in FB group were collected before and after the intervention and analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Single fluid bolus, given after median of 3887 ml (interquartile range 2842; 5359 ml) resuscitation fluids in the preceding 24 h, increased plasma hyaluronan concentration compared to the follow-up strategy (difference in medians 29.2 ng/ml with 95% CI [14.5ng/ml; 55.5ng/ml], P < 0.001). No treatment effect was detected in the plasma levels of syndecan-1, , angiopoietin-2, angiopoietin receptors Tie2 and Tie1, or in soluble thrombomodulin in the adjusted median regression analysis. The increase in hyaluronan was independent of its simultaneous renal clearance but correlated moderately with the increase in endothelium-specific Tie1. The follow-up strategy did not show consistent endothelium-sparing effect but protected against hyaluronan increase. The mechanisms and consequences of hyaluronan fluctuations need further clarification. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02860572. Registered 1 August 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02860572?term=NCT02860572&rank=1.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyHyaluronic AcidIntensive Care UnitsAgedAngiopoietin-2BiomarkersCritical CareCrystalloid SolutionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptor, TIE-2Syndecan-1ThrombomodulinAngiopoietin-2ANGPT2 protein, humanBiomarkersCrystalloid SolutionsHyaluronic AcidReceptor, TIE-2SDC1 protein, humanSyndecan-1THBD protein, humanThrombomodulinAngiopoietinsEndothelial glycocalyxEndotheliumFluid therapyHyaluronanTie1

Identifiers

PMID39242877
PMCPMC11379687

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.