Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39243104›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Examining the influence of anxiety and depression on medication adherence among patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction.

Audai M Ashour, Rami Masa'deh, Shaher H Hamaideh, Rami A Elshatarat, Mohammed Ibrahim Yacoub, Wesam T Almagharbeh, Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Dhafer Alshahrani, Dena Eltabey Sobeh, Mudathir M Eltayeb

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Audai M AshourFaculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Rami Masa'dehFaculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan. r_masadeh@asu.edu.jo.
Shaher H HamaidehCommunity and Mental Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Rami A ElshataratDepartment of Medical and Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Ibrahim YacoubDepartment of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Wesam T AlmagharbehMedical Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Asim Abdullah AlhejailiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Bassam Dhafer AlshahraniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Dena Eltabey SobehDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mudathir M EltayebDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective medication adherence is vital for managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and enhancing patient well-being. This study aimed to evaluate medication adherence levels and associated factors among AMI patients using standardized assessment tools.

methodsEmploying a cross-sectional descriptive design, the study involved 210 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. Participants completed the General Medication Adherence Scale (GMAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and provided socio-demographic details.

resultsThe study revealed partial adherence to medications among AMI patients, with mean scores of 24.89 (± 3.64) out of 33. Notably, good adherence was observed in non-adherence due to patient behavior (mean ± SD = 11.8 ± 2.3 out of 15) and additional disease burden (mean ± SD = 8.65 ± 2.21 out of 12), while partial adherence was noted in non-adherence due to financial constraints (mean ± SD = 4.44 ± 1.34 out of 6). Patients reported mild anxiety (mean ± SD = 8.38 ± 2.81) and no depressive symptoms (mean ± SD = 7.43 ± 2.42). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that employed status, younger age, shorter duration of MI, lower anxiety, and depression levels were associated with higher medication adherence. However, factors such as monthly income, gender, educational level, and marital status did not predict medication adherence.

conclusionThe study highlights the significance of addressing anxiety and depression levels and considering socio-demographic factors when designing interventions to enhance medication adherence among AMI patients. Further research is needed to explore additional determinants of medication adherence and develop tailored interventions to improve patient outcomes post-AMI.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionDrug MonitoringMedication AdherenceMyocardial InfarctionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcute myocardial infarctionAnxietyDepressionJordanMedication adherencePatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39243104
PMCPMC11378470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.