Evidence mapPaperPMID 39243187Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2025

Comparison of mouse models of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Nabil V Sayour, Tamás G Gergely, Barnabás Váradi, Viktória É Tóth, Bence Ágg, Tamás Kovács, Dániel Kucsera, Csenger Kovácsházi, Gábor B Brenner, Zoltán Giricz and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nabil V SayourCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás G GergelyCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Barnabás VáradiCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Viktória É TóthCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence ÁggCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás KovácsCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dániel KucseraCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csenger KovácsháziCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor B BrennerCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán GiriczCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter FerdinandyCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán V VargaCenter for Pharmacology and Drug Research & Development, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-0784

Funding

H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00003Horizon 2020 739593Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium 2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium TKP2021-EGA-23Magyar Tudományos Akadémia LP-2021-14Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Alap NVKP_16-1-2016-0017Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal FK134751Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal K_21-139105Richter Gedeon Talentum AlapítványSemmelweis Egyetem EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a leading cause of death worldwide; thus, therapeutic improvements are needed. In vivo preclinical models are essential to identify molecular drug targets for future therapies. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is a well-established model of HFrEF; however, highly experienced personnel are needed for the surgery, and several weeks of follow-up are necessary to develop HFrEF. To this end, we aimed (i) to develop an easy-to-perform mouse model of HFrEF by treating Balb/c mice with angiotensin-II (Ang-II) for 2 weeks by minipump and (ii) to compare its cardiac phenotype and transcriptome to the well-established TAC model of HFrEF in C57BL/6J mice.

methodsMortality and gross pathological data, cardiac structural and functional characteristics assessed by echocardiography and immunohistochemistry and differential gene expression obtained by RNA-sequencing and gene-ontology analyses were used to characterize and compare the two models. To achieve statistical comparability between the two models, changes in treatment groups related to the corresponding control were compared (ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II).

resultsCompared with the well-established TAC model, chronic Ang-II treatment of Balb/c mice shares similarities in cardiac systolic functional decline (left ventricular ejection fraction: -57.25 ± 7.17% vs. -43.68 ± 5.31% in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II; P = 0.1794) but shows a lesser degree of left ventricular dilation (left ventricular end-systolic volume: 190.81 ± 44.13 vs. 57.37 ± 10.18 mL in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II; P = 0.0252) and hypertrophy (cell surface area: 58.44 ± 6.1 vs. 10.24 ± 2.87 μm

conclusionsHere, we demonstrate for the first time that chronic Ang-II treatment of Balb/c mice is also a relevant, reliable but significantly easier-to-perform preclinical model to identify novel pathomechanisms and targets in future HFrEF research.

Indexed as

Heart FailureStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAngiotensin IIAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLTranscriptomeAngiotensin IIchronic angiotensin‐II infusionheart failure with reduced ejection fractionpreclinical model comparisontransverse aortic constriction

Identifiers

PMID39243187
PMCPMC11769617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.