ArticleGlycobiology2024
Glycoengineering with neuraminic acid analogs to label lipooligosaccharides and detect native sialyltransferase activity in gram-negative bacteria.
Article in Glycobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding sialidase: physiological roles, pathological pathways, and clinical opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Pathological role of RAGE underlying progression of various diseases: its potential as biomarker and therapeutic target.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipooligosaccharides are the most abundant cell surface glycoconjugates on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. They play important roles in host-microbe interactions. Certain Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria cap their lipooligosaccharides with the sialic acid, N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), to mimic host glycans that among others protects these bacteria from recognition by the hosts immune system. This process of molecular mimicry is not fully understood and remains under investigated. To explore the functional role of sialic acid-capped lipooligosaccharides at the molecular level, it is important to have tools readily available for the detection and manipulation of both Neu5Ac on glycoconjugates and the involved sialyltransferases, preferably in live bacteria. We and others have shown that the native sialyltransferases of some Gram-negative bacteria can incorporate extracellular unnatural sialic acid nucleotides onto their lipooligosaccharides. We here report on the expanded use of native bacterial sialyltransferases to incorporate neuraminic acids analogs with a reporter group into the lipooligosaccharides of a variety of Gram-negative bacteria. We show that this approach offers a quick strategy to screen bacteria for the expression of functional sialyltransferases and the ability to use exogenous CMP-Neu5Ac to decorate their glycoconjugates. For selected bacteria we also show this strategy complements two other glycoengineering techniques, Metabolic Oligosaccharide Engineering and Selective Exo-Enzymatic Labeling, and that together they provide tools to modify, label, detect and visualize sialylation of bacterial lipooligosaccharides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.