Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39245159›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2025

Comparative analysis of fixation techniques for signal detection in avian embryos.

Camilo V Echeverria, Tess A Leathers, Crystal D Rogers

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camilo V EcheverriaDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Tess A LeathersDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Crystal D RogersDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: crdrogers@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

UC Davis MCB T32 Administrative Supplement to Recognize Excellence in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) MentorshipT32GM007377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI CHEDIN, FREDERIC LOUIS · 1985 to 2023
$9.9M
Initiative for Maximizing Student Development at the University of California, Davis.T32GM135741 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ALDRIN V. GOMES, Manuel F Navedo · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Mechanisms of microtubule-mediated cranial neural crest EMT and differentiationR03DE032047 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROGERS, CRYSTAL D · 2022 to 2023
$300k
NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE032047NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007377NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of fixation method significantly impacts tissue morphology and visualization of gene expression and proteins after in situ hybridization chain reaction (HCR) or immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively. In this study, we compared the effects of paraformaldehyde (PFA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) fixation techniques prior to HCR and IHC on chicken embryos. Our findings underscore the importance of optimizing fixation methods for accurate visualization and subsequent interpretation of HCR and IHC results, with implications for probe and antibody validation and tissue-specific protein localization studies. We found that TCA fixation resulted in larger and more circular nuclei and neural tubes compared to PFA fixation. Additionally, TCA fixation altered the subcellular fluorescence signal intensity of various proteins, including transcription factors, cytoskeletal proteins, and cadherins. Notably, TCA fixation revealed protein signals in tissues that may be inaccessible with PFA fixation. In contrast, TCA fixation proved ineffective for mRNA visualization. These results highlight the need for optimization of fixation protocols depending on the target and model system, emphasizing the importance of methodological considerations in biological analyses.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryTissue FixationAnimalsChick EmbryoFixativesFormaldehydeIn Situ HybridizationPolymersRNA, MessengerTrichloroacetic AcidFixativesFormaldehydeparaformPolymersRNA, MessengerTrichloroacetic AcidCadherinChickenHCRIHCImmunohistochemistryNeural crestParaformaldehydePAXSOXTrichloroacetic acidTubulin

Identifiers

PMID39245159
PMCPMC11631674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.