ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Acetylcytidine modification of DDX41 and ZNF746 by
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NAT10 promotes proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma through α-tubulin acetylation.Cell adhesion & migration · 2026Article
- The functions, mechanisms and clinical relevance of RNA and protein acetyltransferase NAT10: a comprehensive review.Cell biology and toxicology · 2026Review
- Review
- RNA N4-acetylcytidine modification in human cancers: from molecular function to oncogenic mechanisms.iScience · 2026Review
- The NAT10/acCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- NAT10 and ac4C modification in cancer immunity and metabolism: emerging mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- The function of NAT10-driven N4-acetylcytidine modification in cancer: novel insights and potential therapeutic targets.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Epitranscriptomic control of cancer immunity and therapy resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapidly developed chemoresistance to dacarbazine (DTIC) is a major obstacle in the clinical management of melanoma; however, the roles and mechanisms of epi-transcriptomic RNA modification in this process have not been investigated. Method: DTIC-resistant (DR) melanoma cells were established for bulk RNA sequencing. The expressions of mRNAs were detected using qRT-PCR, and protein levels were determined using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Acetylated RNAs were detected by dot blotting and immunoprecipitation sequencing (acRIP-seq). A lung metastasis mouse model of melanoma was established to evaluate the anti-melanoma effects Results: We identified that the expression of Conclusion: Our study elucidates the previously unrecognized role of NAT10-mediated ac4C modification in the chemoresistance of melanoma and provides a rationale for developing new strategies to overcome chemoresistance in melanoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.