ReviewCureus2024
Nutritional Deficiencies and Subfertility: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safeguarding diet quality in a changing climate: a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Advances in Research on Models of Oligoasthenozoospermia.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Parental dietary patterns and assisted reproductive technology outcomes including embryo morphokinetics: rotterdam periconception cohort.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Reproductive Health and Assisted Conception in Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Role of Mediterranean Diet and Ultra-Processed Foods on Sperm Parameters: Data from a Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Observational
- Most vulnerable diet and health profiles: identifying countries at risk through a three-theme clustering.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subfertility, a condition marked by a reduced capacity to conceive naturally, affects a significant proportion of couples globally. Nutrition is a fundamental aspect of reproductive health, with various nutrients essential in maintaining optimal reproductive function. This comprehensive review explores the intricate relationship between nutritional deficiencies and subfertility. It examines key micronutrients such as vitamins D, E, C, and B12, as well as minerals such as zinc, iron, selenium, and magnesium, and their impacts on fertility. The review also considers macronutrients and the importance of a balanced diet in supporting reproductive health. Drawing on an extensive body of clinical evidence and studies, this review highlights how deficiencies in these nutrients can lead to hormonal imbalances, impaired gametogenesis, and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. It discusses the efficacy of nutritional interventions, including dietary supplements and lifestyle modifications, in improving fertility. Furthermore, it addresses the emerging research on personalized nutrition and its potential to enhance reproductive outcomes. The review underscores the necessity for healthcare providers to assess and address the nutritional status of patients with subfertility. It provides practical recommendations for developing nutritional plans, counseling patients, and integrating nutritional interventions into fertility treatments. By offering a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence, this review aims to inform clinical practice and promote further research into the role of nutrition in enhancing fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.