Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247902›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Prevalence of dementia diagnosis in Sweden by geographical region and sociodemographic subgroups: a nationwide observational study.

Mozhu Ding, Stina Ek, Emil Aho, Linus Jönsson, Katharina Schmidt-Mende, Karin Modig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Older patients with heart failure managed in primary care versus cardiology care: a register-based study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mozhu DingUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stina EkUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emil AhoDivision of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Linus JönssonDivision of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Katharina Schmidt-MendeAcademic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin ModigUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although dementia incidence has decreased in high-income countries, it is important to monitor the prevalence of dementia and identify potential underdiagnosis in population subgroups. This study provides the most up-to-date prevalence of dementia diagnosis in Sweden, by geographical regions and sociodemographic groups. Methods: We identified all individuals aged ≥62 years, registered and alive in Sweden at the end of 2022 (n = 2.48 million). Dementia diagnoses were identified using ICD-9/10 codes in the National Patient Register since 1987, as well as anti-dementia drug use from the Prescribed Drug Register since 2005. Findings: At the end of 2022, 3.7% (92,293/2,483,798) of people aged ≥62 years in Sweden had a dementia diagnosis from specialist care or drug prescriptions and varied from 0.6% in ages 62-69 to 14.8% in ages ≥90. The prevalence of cognitive impairment diagnosis was 2.5%. There was some geographical variation in the prevalence of dementia diagnosis, with a larger proportion of diagnoses coming from drug prescriptions than from specialist care in northern Sweden. While people born abroad and people without a close relative had a slightly higher prevalence of dementia diagnosis than Swedish born and those with close relatives, the prevalence was substantially lower for people living alone than for cohabiting individuals. Interpretation: Comparing case estimates from previous screening cohorts, our results suggest underdiagnosis of dementia in the general older population, particularly among people who live alone. In more rural areas with lower availability of memory clinics, primary care may play an important role in diagnosing older adults with dementia. Funding: Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare; Swedish Research Council; Region Stockholm.

Indexed as

Dementia diagnosisGeographical variationPrevalencePrimary careSpecialist care

Identifiers

PMID39247902
PMCPMC11378931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.