Evidence mapPaperPMID 39250810Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2024

Hormonal Treatments and Vaginal Moisturizers for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : A Systematic Review.

Elisheva R Danan, Catherine Sowerby, Kristen E Ullman, Kristine Ensrud, Mary L Forte, Nicholas Zerzan, Maylen Anthony, Caleb Kalinowski, Hamdi I Abdi, Jessica K Friedman and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07574216 (The Use of Vaginal Estrogen vs DHEA in Perimenopausal and Menopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07574216 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Vaginal Estrogen vs DHEA in Perimenopausal and Menopausal Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2026 to 2031Enrolled324ConditionsPost-menopause, Pre-menopause, Sexual Function, MenopauseArmsDHEA ovals, Estradiol 0.01% Vag Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Elisheva R DananCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (E.R.D., S.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-2925-8924
Catherine SowerbyCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Kristen E UllmanCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-4726-3997
Kristine EnsrudCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota; and Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.).
Mary L ForteDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.F., H.I.A., M.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-4566-2529
Nicholas ZerzanCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Maylen AnthonyCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Caleb KalinowskiCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Hamdi I AbdiDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.F., H.I.A., M.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-1191-0726
Jessica K FriedmanVA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Los Angeles, California (J.K.F.).ORCID 0000-0003-3501-0201
Adrienne LandsteinerCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Nancy GreerCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.S., K.E.U., N.Z., M.A., C.K., A.L., N.G.).
Rahel NardosDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.N.).
Cynthia FokDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (C.F.).ORCID 0000-0003-1197-0099
Philipp DahmUrology Section, VA Health Care System, and Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (P.D.).
Mary ButlerDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.F., H.I.A., M.B.).
Timothy J WiltCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota; and Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (T.J.W.).
Susan DiemCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (E.R.D., S.D.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmenopausal women commonly experience vulvovaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). PURPOSE: To evaluate effectiveness and harms of vaginal estrogen, nonestrogen hormone therapies, and vaginal moisturizers for treatment of GSM symptoms. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and CINAHL through 11 December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 8 weeks' duration enrolling postmenopausal women with at least 1 GSM symptom and reporting effectiveness or harms of hormonal interventions or vaginal moisturizers. DATA EXTRACTION: Risk of bias and data extraction were performed by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed by one reviewer and verified by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 11 993 citations, 46 RCTs evaluating vaginal estrogen ( LIMITATIONS: Most studies were 12 weeks or less in duration and used heterogeneous GSM diagnostic criteria and outcome measures. Few studies enrolled women with a history of cancer.

conclusionVaginal estrogen, vaginal DHEA, oral ospemifene, and vaginal moisturizers may improve some GSM symptoms in the short term. Few long-term data exist on efficacy, comparative effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of GSM treatments. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42023400684).

Indexed as

EstrogensFemale Urogenital DiseasesMenopauseAdministration, IntravaginalDehydroepiandrosteroneDyspareuniaEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSyndromeTamoxifenVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesDehydroepiandrosteroneEstrogensOspemifeneTamoxifenVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID39250810
PMCPMC12333043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.