ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Bibliometric analysis of ophthalmic OCT and OCT angiography research trends over the past 20 years.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOptical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) are widely used in the diagnosis of ophthalmic diseases. This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of ophthalmologic OCT and OCT angiography.
methodsWe retrieved publications on ophthalmic OCT and OCTA from 2003 to 2022 from the Web of Science Core Collection and used bibliometric tools to analyze and visualize the distribution, trend, and hotspots.
resultsIn total, 20,817 articles written by 48,160 authors from 106 countries were selected. The number of publications has significantly increased. In the last two decades, the USA was the most productive country and received the highest citations. The most productive journal was Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science and received the highest number of citations. Moorfields Eye Hospital was the most productive institution. Bandello F published the most papers, while Spaide RF was the highest cited author. SPAIDE RF, 2011, AM J Ophthalmology was the most cited document. "OCT", "glaucoma" and "OCTA" were three hotspots in the last two decades. "Vessel density" and "deep learning" would be research hotspots in the future.
conclusionThe bibliometric analysis of ophthalmic OCT and OCTA research over the past two decades on keywords, authors, citations, hotspots and trends will provide global researchers with valuable information for future research and cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39251539What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.