Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253620›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024

Community pharmacy & primary care integration: qualitative study on stakeholders' opinions and interventions.

Amaia Urionagüena, Celia Piquer-Martinez, Shalom Isaac Benrimoj, Begoña Calvo, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas, Fernando Martinez-Martinez, Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amaia UrionagüenaPharmacy Practice Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-4167
Celia Piquer-MartinezPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-1464
Shalom Isaac BenrimojPharmacy Practice Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-7838
Begoña CalvoPharmacy Practice Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Victoria Garcia-CardenasPharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology Department, Social and Legal Pharmacy Section, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-4557
Fernando Martinez-MartinezPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Miguel Angel GastelurrutiaPharmacy Practice Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1019-0234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health systems worldwide are under pressure. Integration seems a possible solution to improve healthcare systems efficiency. This research aims to gather stakeholders' opinions on integrating community pharmacy and the primary healthcare system and secondly to explore and prioritise interventions for an initial integration plan. Method: Using a constructivist qualitative research approach, a two-phase qualitative study was conducted in the Basque Country, Spain. Thematic analysis using NVivo® was undertaken on data gathered during focus groups and semi-structured interviews (phase 1). During phase 2, a nominal group prioritised potential integration interventions identified in phase 1. Results: The study amalgamated findings from four focus groups and nine interviews, revealing six themes. Stakeholders had a diverse understanding of integration, associating the term mainly with collaboration, communication or cooperation. Community pharmacies were positively perceived; however, their commercial and privately owned nature was of concern. Remuneration methods for pharmacists were controversial, with a suggested shift to service-based remuneration. Information availability and barriers such as interprofessional communication gaps were highlighted. The nominal group prioritised, according to importance and feasibility, bidirectional communication development, coordination in using interprofessional protocols and community pharmacist participation in primary healthcare centre meetings as interventions for integrating community pharmacies and primary healthcare centres. Conclusion: Based on the opinions of stakeholders, three interventions are proposed to initiate the integration process of community pharmacy and primary care. The implementation of these interventions will need to be negotiated with the relevant authorities and evaluated.

Indexed as

community pharmacyHealthcare systemhealth policyintegrationprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39253620
PMCPMC11382723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.