Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39254840›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2024

Genetic associations with disease in populations with Indigenous American ancestries.

Lucas Vicuña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lucas VicuñaUniversity of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Section of Genetic Medicine, Chicago, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-0032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic architecture of complex diseases affecting populations with Indigenous American ancestries is poorly understood due to their underrepresentation in genomics studies. While most of the genetic diversity associated with disease trait variation is shared among worldwide populations, a fraction of this component is expected to be unique to each continental group, including Indigenous Americans. Here, I describe the current state of knowledge from genome-wide association studies on Indigenous populations, as well as non-Indigenous populations with partial Indigenous ancestries from the American continent, focusing on disease susceptibility and anthropometric traits. While some studies identified risk alleles unique to Indigenous populations, their effects on trait variation are mostly small. I suggest that the associations rendered by many inter-population studies are probably inflated due to the absence of socio-cultural-economic covariates in the association models. I encourage the inclusion of admixed individuals in future GWAS studies to control for inter-ancestry differences in environmental factors. I suggest that some complex diseases might have arisen as trade-off costs of adaptations to past evolutionary selective pressures. Finally, I discuss how expanding panels with Indigenous ancestries in GWAS studies is key to accurately assess genetic risk in populations from the American continent, thus decreasing global health disparities.

Identifiers

PMID39254840
PMCPMC11384980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.