Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255000›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Single-cell analysis identifies distinct macrophage phenotypes associated with prodisease and proresolving functions in the endometriotic niche.

Yasmin Henlon, Kavita Panir, Iona McIntyre, Chloe Hogg, Priya Dhami, Antonia O Cuff, Anna Senior, Niky Moolchandani-Adwani, Elise T Courtois, Andrew W Horne and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Endometriosis: An Immunologist's Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yasmin Henlon *Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Kavita Panir *Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7139-819X
Iona McIntyre *Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Chloe HoggCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3277-5359
Priya DhamiDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Antonia O CuffDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Anna SeniorDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Niky Moolchandani-AdwaniDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Elise T CourtoisSingle Cell Biology Lab, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032.
Andrew W HorneCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-493X
Matthew RosserDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Sascha OttDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5411-8114
Erin GreavesDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-5851

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009238/1Medical Research Council MR/S002456/2UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) M.R./S002456/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis negatively impacts the health-related quality of life of 190 million women worldwide. Novel advances in nonhormonal treatments for this debilitating condition are desperately needed. Macrophages play a vital role in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and represent a promising therapeutic target. In the current study, we revealed the full transcriptomic complexity of endometriosis-associated macrophage subpopulations using single-cell analyses in a preclinical mouse model of experimental endometriosis. We have identified two key lesion-resident populations that resemble i) tumor-associated macrophages (characterized by expression of

Indexed as

EndometriosisMacrophagesSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEndometriumFemaleHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMicePhenotypeTranscriptomeendometriosisheterogeneitylesionmacrophagephenotype

Identifiers

PMID39255000
PMCPMC11420174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.