Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255064›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Trait imputation enhances nonlinear genetic prediction for some traits.

Ruoyu He, Jinwen Fu, Jingchen Ren, Wei Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Which RJournal of human genetics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruoyu HeDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
Jinwen FuDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
Jingchen RenDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-0582

Funding

Causal and integrative deep learning for Alzheimer's disease geneticsU01AG073079 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Discovering causal genes, brain regions and other risk factors for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG065636 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065636NIA NIH HHS U01 AG073079NIH HHS U01AG073079 and R01AG065636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansive collection of genetic and phenotypic data within biobanks offers an unprecedented opportunity for biomedical research. However, the frequent occurrence of missing phenotypes presents a significant barrier to fully leveraging this potential. In our target application, on one hand, we have only a small and complete dataset with both genotypes and phenotypes to build a genetic prediction model, commonly called a polygenic (risk) score (PGS or PRS); on the other hand, we have a large dataset of genotypes (e.g. from a biobank) without the phenotype of interest. Our goal is to leverage the large dataset of genotypes (but without the phenotype) and a separate genome-wide association studies summary dataset of the phenotype to impute the phenotypes, which are then used as an individual-level dataset, along with the small complete dataset, to build a nonlinear model as PGS. More specifically, we trained some nonlinear models to 7 imputed and observed phenotypes from the UK Biobank data. We then trained an ensemble model to integrate these models for each trait, resulting in higher R2 values in prediction than using only the small complete (observed) dataset. Additionally, for 2 of the 7 traits, we observed that the nonlinear model trained with the imputed traits had higher R2 than using the imputed traits directly as the PGS, while for the remaining 5 traits, no improvement was found. These findings demonstrate the potential of leveraging existing genetic data and accounting for nonlinear genetic relationships to improve prediction accuracy for some traits.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypeGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, Heritablegenome-wide association studies (GWAS)LS-imputationmachine learningpolygenic score (PGS)SNP

Identifiers

PMID39255064
PMCPMC12098936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.