Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Exploring the interplay between colorectal cancer subtypes genomic variants and cellular morphology: A deep-learning approach.

Hadar Hezi, Daniel Shats, Daniel Gurevich, Yosef E Maruvka, Moti Freiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hadar HeziFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Daniel ShatsFaculty of Computer Science, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Daniel GurevichFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Yosef E MaruvkaFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Moti FreimanFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-1548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer (CRC) significantly influence treatment decisions. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently been introduced for automated CRC subtype identification using H&E stained histopathological images, the correlation between CRC subtype genomic variants and their corresponding cellular morphology expressed by their imaging phenotypes is yet to be fully explored. The goal of this study was to determine such correlations by incorporating genomic variants in CNN models for CRC subtype classification from H&E images. We utilized the publicly available TCGA-CRC-DX dataset, which comprises whole slide images from 360 CRC-diagnosed patients (260 for training and 100 for testing). This dataset also provides information on CRC subtype classifications and genomic variations. We trained CNN models for CRC subtype classification that account for potential correlation between genomic variations within CRC subtypes and their corresponding cellular morphology patterns. We assessed the interplay between CRC subtypes' genomic variations and cellular morphology patterns by evaluating the CRC subtype classification accuracy of the different models in a stratified 5-fold cross-validation experimental setup using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and average precision (AP) as the performance metrics. The CNN models that account for potential correlation between genomic variations within CRC subtypes and their cellular morphology pattern achieved superior accuracy compared to the baseline CNN classification model that does not account for genomic variations when using either single-nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP) molecular features (AUROC: 0.824±0.02 vs. 0.761±0.04, p<0.05, AP: 0.652±0.06 vs. 0.58±0.08) or CpG-Island methylation phenotype (CIMP) molecular features (AUROC: 0.834±0.01 vs. 0.787±0.03, p<0.05, AP: 0.687±0.02 vs. 0.64±0.05). Combining the CNN models account for variations in CIMP and SNP further improved classification accuracy (AUROC: 0.847±0.01 vs. 0.787±0.03, p = 0.01, AP: 0.68±0.02 vs. 0.64±0.05). The improved accuracy of CNN models for CRC subtype classification that account for potential correlation between genomic variations within CRC subtypes and their corresponding cellular morphology as expressed by H&E imaging phenotypes may elucidate the biological cues impacting cancer histopathological imaging phenotypes. Moreover, considering CRC subtypes genomic variations has the potential to improve the accuracy of deep-learning models in discerning cancer subtype from histopathological imaging data.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningGenomicsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39255280
PMCPMC11386451

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.