Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

mRNA-1273 vaccination induces polyfunctional memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in patients with solid cancers undergoing immunotherapy or/and chemotherapy.

Anastasia Gangaev, Yannick van Sleen, Nicole Brandhorst, Kelly Hoefakker, Bimal Prajapati, Amrita Singh, Annemarie Boerma, Marieke van der Heiden, Sjoukje F Oosting, Astrid A M van der Veldt and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anastasia GangaevDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yannick van SleenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Nicole BrandhorstDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kelly HoefakkerDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bimal PrajapatiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Amrita SinghDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Annemarie BoermaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Marieke van der HeidenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Sjoukje F OostingDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Astrid A M van der VeldtDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center (MC)-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
T Jeroen N HiltermannDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Corine H GeurtsvanKesselDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anne-Marie C DingemansDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Egbert F SmitDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elisabeth G E de VriesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
John B A G HaanenDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pia KvistborgDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Debbie van BaarleDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research has confirmed the safety and comparable seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with solid cancers. However, the impact of cancer treatment on vaccine-induced T cell responses remains poorly understood. Methods: In this study, we expand on previous findings within the VOICE trial by evaluating the functional and phenotypic composition of mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses in patients with solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or both, compared to individuals without cancer. We conducted an ELISpot analysis on 386 participants to assess spike-specific T cell responses 28 days after full vaccination. Further in-depth characterization of using flow cytometry was performed on a subset of 63 participants to analyze the functional phenotype and differentiation state of spike-specific T cell responses. Results: ELISpot analysis showed robust induction of spike-specific T cell responses across all treatment groups, with response rates ranging from 75% to 80%. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a distinctive cytokine production pattern across cohorts, with CD4 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2, and CD8 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and CCL4. Variations were observed in the proportion of monofunctional CD4 T cells producing TNF, particularly higher in individuals without cancer and patients treated with chemotherapy alone, while those treated with immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy predominantly produced IFNγ. Despite these differences, polyfunctional spike-specific memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were comparable across cohorts. Notably, immunotherapy-treated patients exhibited an expansion of spike-specific CD4 T cells with a terminally differentiated effector memory phenotype. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that systemic treatment in patients with solid tumors does not compromise the quality of polyfunctional mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses. This underscores the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancers undergoing systemic treatment.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19Memory T CellsNeoplasmsSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunologic MemoryImmunotherapyMaleMiddle Aged2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273COVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronaviruscancerchemoimmunotherapychemotherapyCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinationimmunotherapySARS-CoV-2-specific T cells

Identifiers

PMID39257577
PMCPMC11385311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.