Evidence mapPaperPMID 39257902Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Differential association of abdominal, liver, and epicardial adiposity with anthropometry, diabetes, and cardiac remodeling in Asians.

Vivian Lee, Yiying Han, Desiree-Faye Toh, Jennifer A Bryant, Redha Boubertakh, Thu-Thao Le, Calvin W L Chin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Semaglutide Effects on Adipose Tissue and Emerging Effects on Brain and Cognition.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivian LeeNational Heart Research Institute Singapore (NHRIS), National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yiying HanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Desiree-Faye TohNational Heart Research Institute Singapore (NHRIS), National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jennifer A BryantDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Redha BoubertakhNational Heart Research Institute Singapore (NHRIS), National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Thu-Thao Le *National Heart Research Institute Singapore (NHRIS), National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Calvin W L Chin *National Heart Research Institute Singapore (NHRIS), National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heterogenous deposition and homeostasis roles of physiologic and ectopic adipose tissues underscore the impact of fat compartmentalization on cardiometabolic risk. We aimed to characterize the distribution of abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), and liver fat on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluate their associations with anthropometric indices and adverse cardiac remodeling. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 149 Asian adults (57.0 ± 12.8 years; 65% males) with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor underwent multiparametric fat and cardiovascular MRI. Anthropometric indices included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), and bioimpedance body fat mass (BFM). Associations between fat depots and anthropometric measures as well as cardiac remodeling features were examined as a single cohort and stratified by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) status. Results: VAT and SAT had opposing associations with liver fat and EAT. Therefore the VAT/SAT ratio was explored as an integrated marker of visceral adiposity. VAT/SAT was positively associated with EAT (β=0.35, P<0.001) and liver fat (β=0.32, P=0.003) independent of confounders. Of the anthropometric measurements assessed, only WHR was independently associated with VAT/SAT (β=0.17, P=0.021). Individuals with T2DM had higher VAT and lower SAT compared to those without T2DM, translating to a significantly higher VAT/SAT ratio. EAT volume was independently associated with adverse features of cardiac remodeling: increased left ventricular (LV) mass (β=0.24, P=0.005), larger myocyte volume (β=0.26, P=0.001), increased myocardial fibrosis (β=0.19, P=0.023), higher concentricity (β=0.18, P=0.035), and elevated wall stress (β=-0.18, P=0.023). Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI revealed abdominal VAT and SAT have differential associations with anthropometric indices and ectopic fats in a single cohort of Asians at risk of cardiometabolic disease. People with T2DM have expanded VAT and diminished SAT, endorsing the VAT/SAT ratio beyond usual anthropometric measurements as a marker for multiorgan visceral fat composition. Among the fat depots examined, EAT is uniquely associated with adverse cardiac remodeling, suggesting its distinctive cardiometabolic properties and implications.

Indexed as

AdiposityIntra-Abdominal FatPericardiumVentricular RemodelingAbdominal FatAdultAgedAnthropometryAsian PeopleCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleanthropometric indicescardiac remodelingcardiometabolic diseasediabetesepicardial fatfat distributionmagnetic resonance imagingvisceral adiposity

Identifiers

PMID39257902
PMCPMC11385302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.