Evidence mapPaperPMID 39258680Full record

SynthesisCadernos de saude publica2024

Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lucas Pitrez Mocellin, Hewellynn de Azeredo Gomes, Lincoln Sona, Gabrielle Maria Giacomini, Eduarda Pires Pizzuti, Gabriéli Borges Nunes, Túlio Marcos Zanchet, Juliana Lopes de Macedo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucas Pitrez MocellinUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-9857
Hewellynn de Azeredo GomesUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3748-2202
Lincoln SonaUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-470X
Gabrielle Maria GiacominiUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1914-1164
Eduarda Pires PizzutiUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-9957
Gabriéli Borges NunesUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-2350
Túlio Marcos ZanchetUniversidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9043-6825
Juliana Lopes de MacedoUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-048X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study estimates gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Brazil. A systematic review was conducted with articles published between 2010 and 2021 on the PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SciELO, LILACS and Virtual Health Library databases, as well as gray literature. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument together with the risk of bias assessment tool proposed by Hoy et al. A meta-analysis with robust variance and random effects was developed. Heterogeneity was verified using I2 and publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Egger's test. Prevalence according to risk of bias, diagnostic criteria and country's regions was determined by subgroup analyses. A total of 32 studies were included, representing 21,942 women. gestational diabetes mellitus pooled prevalence was 14% (95%CI: 11.0; 16.0), considerably higher than estimates from previous studies. Regarding risk of bias, studies with low, medium, and high risk showed a pooled prevalence of 12%, 14% and 14%, respectively. Overall GRADE certainty of evidence rating was low. Most studies used the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria or the adapted IADPSG, showing a pooled prevalence of 15% and 14%, respectively. As for region, the pooled prevalence was higher in the Southeast (14%) and lower in the Central-West (9%). This is the first systematic review to provide evidence on gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence at a national level and to demonstrate considerable heterogeneity among articles and the influence of region, diagnostic criteria and study quality on the referred indicator.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalBrazilFemaleHumansPregnancyPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39258680
PMCPMC11386532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.