Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259185›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Integrating Monogenic, Polygenic, and Epidemiologic Risk.

Sarah S Kalia, Nicholas J Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A Haiman, Fei Chen and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Sarah S KaliaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1725-3445
Nicholas J BoddickerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-2072
Siddhartha YadavMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-4630-9903
Hongyan HuangDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0000-8063-1088
Jie NaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-1805
Chunling HuMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-4639
Christine B AmbrosoneRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-9943
Song YaoRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9442-1313
Christopher A HaimanKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0097-9971
Fei ChenKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-9932
Esther M JohnStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-8003
Allison W KurianStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-9470
Boya GuoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-4084
Sara LindstrӧmDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-7137-7281
Paul AuerMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-8044
James V LaceyBeckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4560-8592
Susan L NeuhausenBeckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5053-0390
Maria Elena MartinezUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6728-1834
Dale P SandlerInstitute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6776-0018
Katie M O'BrienInstitute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1931-1349
Jack A TaylorInstitute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5303-6398
Lauren R TerasAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-2419-8536
James M HodgeAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-7394
Adriana LoriAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-8686-0148
Clara BodelonAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-6578-2678
Amy Trentham-DietzUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-4660
Elizabeth S BurnsideUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-435X
Celine M VachonMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-9322
Stacey J WinhamMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8492-9102
David E GoldgarUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-0697-9347
Susan M DomchekPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-7272
Katherine L NathansonPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-0901
Jeffrey N WeitzelLatin American School of Oncology, Sierra Madre, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6714-092X
Fergus J CouchMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9417-9985
Peter KraftDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-8103

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI A. Clementina Mesaros · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Risk and penetrance of mutations from breast cancer testing panels.R01CA192393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, NATHANSON, KATHERINE L. · 2014 to 2018
$6.3M
Resolving the cancer relevance of predisposition gene mutationsR35CA253187 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2020 to 2026
$5.8M
Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
American Cancer Society (ACS)Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044005National Institutes of Health (NIH) P50CA116201National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01CA192393National Institutes of Health (NIH) Z01ES044005NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192393NCI NIH HHS R35 CA253187NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive, and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited.

methodsWe extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium.

resultsThe model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population.

conclusionsThese results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. IMPACT: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39259185
PMCPMC11530304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.