Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after dynamic fixation or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis tear: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Midterm Outcomes After Suture Button Fixation for Arthroscopically Confirmed Concomitant Syndesmotic Instability in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute syndesmosis tears can be treated by static screw or dynamic fixation. Various studies have compared these techniques regarding postoperative outcome. However, to our knowledge, no study has used 3D-instrumented gait analysis (IGA). We hypothesized that a dynamic fixation would perform non-inferior to screw fixation in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients were prospectively randomized to both groups. All patients received the same follow-up rehabilitation and consultations (6 and 12 weeks; 6 and 12 months) postoperatively. Standardized questionnaires were used to objectify pain and ankle function. At 6 months follow-up, IGA was conducted additionally to objectify the biomechanical outcome.
resultsTwenty-five patients in the dynamic fixation (DF) group using TightRope® and twenty-five in the screw fixation group (SF) completed gait analysis. The DF group showed significantly higher mean values for maximum moment in the affected ankle joint (DF: 1.40 ± 0.21 Nm, SF: 1.23 ± 0.30 Nm; p = 0.023) and the unaffected ankle joint (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20 Nm, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27 Nm; p = 0.035). The difference between the affected and unaffected ankle joint was significantly higher in the SF group for active plantarflexion (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20°, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27°; p = 0.035). Both dynamic and screw fixation groups exhibited significantly reduced plantarflexion during the push-off and early swing phase, with moments and powers in the ankle joint also significantly impaired.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that dynamic fixation has better or similar biomechanical and clinical outcomes compared to screw fixation. Future research should focus on biomechanical differences during gait as well as clinical outcomes in case of earlier weight-bearing after dynamic fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): DRKS00013562 Date of Registration: 07/12/2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39259306What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.