Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259446›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2024

Dynamics of Neurogenic Signals as Biological Switchers of Brain Plasticity.

João F Moreira, Susana Solá

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

João F MoreiraResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.
Susana SoláResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal. susana.sola@ff.ul.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of adult neurogenesis in the middle of the past century is considered one of the most important breakthroughs in neuroscience. Despite its controversial nature, this discovery shaped our concept of neural plasticity, revolutionizing the way we look at our brains. In fact, after the discovery of adult neurogenesis, we started to consider the brain as something even more dynamic and highly adaptable. In neurogenic niches, adult neurogenesis is supported by neural stem cells (NSCs). These cells possess a unique set of characteristics such as being quiescent for long periods while actively sensing and reacting to their surroundings to influence a multitude of processes, including the generation of new neurons and glial cells. Therefore, NSCs can be viewed as sentinels to our brain's homeostasis, being able to replace damaged cells and simultaneously secrete numerous factors that restore regular brain function. In addition, it is becoming increasingly evident that NSCs play a central role in memory formation and consolidation. In this review, we will dissect how NSCs influence their surroundings through paracrine and autocrine types of action. We will also depict the mechanism of action of each factor. Finally, we will describe how NSCs integrate different and often opposing signals to guide their fate.

Indexed as

BrainNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsHumansSignal TransductionAutocrineNeural Stem CellNeurogenic NichesParacrineSignals

Identifiers

PMID39259446
PMCPMC11554707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.