Trial reportJournal of geriatric oncology2024
Associations of quality of social support and accurate beliefs about curability among older adults with advanced cancer.
Trial report in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSupporting older adults with advanced cancer to better understand their disease and its prognosis is important for shared decision-making. Social support is a potentially modifiable factor that may influence disease understanding. In this study, we examined the associations of quantity and quality of social support with patients' beliefs about the curability of their advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial that recruited older adults aged ≥70 with advanced incurable cancer. At enrollment, patients completed the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Medical Social Support form that measures both quantity (number of close friends and relatives) and quality of social support. Quality of social support was measured using 12 questions in instrumental and emotional support, each ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher cumulative scores indicated greater quality of support. For beliefs about curability, patients were asked, "What do you believe are the chances that your cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?" Responses were 0 %, <50 %, 50/50, >50 %, and 100 %. Ordinal logistic regression was used to investigate the association of quantity and quality of social support with beliefs about curability, adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsWe included 347 patients; mean age was 76.4 years and 91 % were white. Quantity of social support was not associated with belief in curability [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.03, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.92, 1.16)]. For every unit increase in the quality of social support (OARS Medical Social Support score), the odds of believing in curability decreased by 26.7 % [AOR 0.73, 95 % CI (0.56, 0.97)]. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated that the quality, but not the quantity, of social support was associated with patients' beliefs about curability. These findings suggest that bolstering social support may directly enhance disease understanding. This insight informs supportive care interventions that specifically address disease comprehension among patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.