Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260466›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2025

A Computational Account of the Development and Evolution of Psychotic Symptoms.

Albert Powers, Phillip A Angelos, Alexandria Bond, Emily Farina, Carolyn Fredericks, Jay Gandhi, Maximillian Greenwald, Gabriela Hernandez-Busot, Gabriel Hosein, Megan Kelley and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Future of Perceptual Dysregulation in Psychiatric Nosology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Albert PowersYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: albert.powers@yale.edu.
Phillip A AngelosYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alexandria BondYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Emily FarinaYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Carolyn FredericksYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jay GandhiYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Maximillian GreenwaldYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Gabriela Hernandez-BusotYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Gabriel HoseinYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Megan KelleyYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Catalina MourguesYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
William PalmerDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Julia Rodriguez-SanchezCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rashina SeaburyYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Silmilly ToribioYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Raina VinYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jeremy WeleffYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Scott WoodsYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
David BenrimohDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

PREMAP - Predictors and Risk Evaluation for Menopause-Associated PsychosisR01MH131768 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert R Powers · 2023 to 2026
$3.6M
Neural Mechanisms of Voluntary Control Over HallucinationsR01MH129721 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POWERS, ALBERT R · 2022 to 2024
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129721NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131768Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms of psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions are often investigated in fully formed illness, well after symptoms emerge. These investigations have yielded key insights but are not well positioned to reveal the dynamic forces underlying symptom formation itself. Understanding symptom development over time would allow us to identify steps in the pathophysiological process leading to psychosis, shifting the focus of psychiatric intervention from symptom alleviation to prevention. We propose a model for understanding the emergence of psychotic symptoms within the context of an adaptive, developing neural system. We make the case for a pathophysiological process that begins with cortical hyperexcitability and bottom-up noise transmission, which engenders inappropriate belief formation via aberrant prediction error signaling. We argue that this bottom-up noise drives learning about the (im)precision of new incoming sensory information because of diminished signal-to-noise ratio, causing a compensatory relative overreliance on prior beliefs. This overreliance on priors predisposes to hallucinations and covaries with hallucination severity. An overreliance on priors may also lead to increased conviction in the beliefs generated by bottom-up noise and drive movement toward conversion to psychosis. We identify predictions of our model at each stage, examine evidence to support or refute those predictions, and propose experiments that could falsify or help select between alternative elements of the overall model. Nesting computational abnormalities within longitudinal development allows us to account for hidden dynamics among the mechanisms driving symptom formation and to view established symptoms as a point of equilibrium among competing biological forces.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPsychotic DisordersComputer SimulationDelusionsHumansModels, NeurologicalComputational psychiatryHallucinationsNosologyPerceptionPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID39260466
PMCPMC11634669

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.