ReviewJournal of advanced research2025
Biomarkers differentiating regression from progression among untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 lesions.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Change in CD86 Expression Is Associated with Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Vaginal Microbiota Composition and HPV Genotype-Specific CIN2+ Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cystic lesions and their role in pancreatic cancer risk stratification.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Dynamics of Cervical Lesions After Excisional Treatment in Relation to HPV Genotypes and Cytological Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Novel NDiscover oncology · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Regulation and Gene Expression Profiles in Cervical Swabs: Toward Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Cervical Lesion Progression.Epigenomes · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk factors of histologic upgrade between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Unveiling the expression and mechanistic role of SYCP2 in cervical lesions.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Harnessing the Power of Microbiota: How Do KeyBiology · 2025Review
- Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Antioxidant Strategies in Cervical Cancer-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Vitamin D, immune microenvironment, and cervical lesions: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies from polyps to carcinoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Association between DNA methylation predicted growth differentiation factor 15 and mortality: results from NHANES 1999-2002.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is one of the precursor stages before cervical lesions develop into cervical cancer. The spontaneous development of CIN2 is ambiguous. One part of CIN2 lesions will progress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+), another part will regress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or less (CIN1-), and the last part will persist. Although the guidelines suggest that CIN2 patients with fertility requirements can be treated conservatively to minimize the risk of infertility and obstetric complications, most CIN2 patients undergo surgical treatment to prevent the progression of the disease, which will lead to over-treatment and unnecessary complications. AIM OF REVIEW: The clinical outcome of CIN2 lesions is unpredictable and depends on histopathological examinations. Thus, it is necessary to identify the biomarkers differentiating regression lesions from progression lesions, which is conducive to supporting individualised treatment. The natural history of CIN2 is commonly regulated by the interaction of human papillomavirus (HPV) viral factors (HPV genotype and HPV methylation), host factors (p16/Ki-67 status, host gene methylation effects, human leukocyte antigen subtypes and immune microenvironment) and other factors (vaginal microbiota). KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: This review summarized the biomarkers predicting the spontaneous regression of CIN2, which correlated with HPV infection, the (epi)genetic change of host genes and microenvironment change. However, potential biomarkers must be validated with prospective cohort studies, which should be conducted with expanded enrollment, a longer observational period and the tracking of more patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.