Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39261503›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Histones and histone variant families in prokaryotes.

Samuel Schwab, Yimin Hu, Bert van Erp, Marc K M Cajili, Marcus D Hartmann, Birte Hernandez Alvarez, Vikram Alva, Aimee L Boyle, Remus T Dame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chromatin and gene regulation in archaea.Molecular microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nucleosomes at the Dawn of Eukaryotes.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel SchwabLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-9528-7736
Yimin HuDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-8965
Bert van ErpLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marc K M CajiliLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marcus D HartmannDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6937-5677
Birte Hernandez AlvarezDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-8698
Vikram AlvaDepartment of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1188-473X
Aimee L BoyleLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Remus T DameLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. rtdame@chem.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9863-1692

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) OCENW.GROOT.2019.012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histones are important chromatin-organizing proteins in eukaryotes and archaea. They form superhelical structures around which DNA is wrapped. Recent studies have shown that some archaea and bacteria contain alternative histones that exhibit different DNA binding properties, in addition to highly divergent sequences. However, the vast majority of these histones are identified in metagenomes and thus are difficult to study in vivo. The recent revolutionary breakthroughs in computational protein structure prediction by AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAfold allow for unprecedented insights into the potential function and structure of previously uncharacterized proteins. Here, we categorize the prokaryotic histone space into 17 distinct groups based on AlphaFold2 predictions. We identify a superfamily of histones, termed α3 histones, which are common in archaea and present in several bacteria. Importantly, we establish the existence of a large family of histones throughout archaea and in some bacteriophages that, instead of wrapping DNA, bridge DNA, thereby diverging from conventional nucleosomal histones.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaHistonesAmino Acid SequenceArchaeal ProteinsModels, MolecularNucleosomesPhylogenyProkaryotic CellsArchaeal ProteinsHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID39261503
PMCPMC11390915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.