ArticleBMC cancer2024
Vasculogenic mimicry triggers early recidivation and resistance to adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rewiring cancer cell fate toward vasculogenic mimicry: from classical to unconventional processes.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- SAP18 drives vasculogenic mimicry in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a machine learning and multi-omics investigation.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- EPHB2 drives EMT-linked vasculogenic mimicry and cervical cancer progression via an ERK-ETV4 transcriptional program.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in targeting vasculogenic mimicry in malignant tumors using monomeric compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicine (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and postoperative adjuvant therapy on the prognosis and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), as well as to assess whether VM affects the clinical benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy.
methodsThis single-center retrospective analysis included patients who underwent radical surgery for ESCC, which was documented in the medical record system. The presence or absence of VM in surgical specimens was determined using double staining with PAS/CD31. Stratification was applied based on adjuvant therapy and VM status. Survival curves and COX modeling were used to analyze the impact of the presence or absence of VM on the benefit of adjuvant therapy and the survival prognosis of patients.
resultsVM-positive patients were more prone to postoperative recurrence and metastasis. VM was identified as an independent risk factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.809-3.852) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.603-2.786) in postoperative ESCC. Postoperative adjuvant therapy significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.008) and OS time (p < 0.001) in patients with stage II and III ESCC, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy being the most effective. However, the presence of VM significantly reduced the benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001).
conclusionVM negatively impacts the prognosis of postoperative ESCC patients and reduces the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.