ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Model Predicting the Risk of Endometrial Hyperplasia Developing into Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning Model Integrating Preoperative Blood-Based Indices for Early and Noninvasive Detection of Endometrial Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Advancements in Minimally Invasive Techniques and Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Diagnostic Approaches and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 200 patients with endometrial hyperplasia to predict the risk of concurrent endometrial cancer. Methods: Patients were categorized into either the endometrial cancer group or the endometrial hyperplasia group based on post-hysterectomy pathology. The investigation compared general information, tumor indices, fertility history, preoperative endometrial sampling methods, comorbidities, and clinical symptoms between the groups to identify risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia complicating endometrial cancer. Results: (1) Of the 200 patients, 68 (34.0%) were diagnosed with concurrent endometrial cancer post-hysterectomy. Among these, 60 (88.24%) had endometrioid adenocarcinoma, while 8 (11.76%) had other types. Stage I was identified in 58 patients (85.29%) and Stage II in 10 patients (14.71%). High differentiation was observed in 57 cases (83.82%), moderate differentiation in 7 cases (10.29%), and poor differentiation in 4 cases (5.89%), indicating that most endometrial cancers complicated by hyperplasia were early-stage, well-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas; (2) Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in age, menopausal status, length of menopause, and preoperative endometrial pathology of severe atypical hyperplasia between the groups; (3) Multivariate analysis indicated significant differences for age ≥ 53.5 years (OR: 4.307, 95% CI: 2.018-9.192, Conclusion: In conclusion, patients aged ≥ 53.5 years, those who are menopausal, and those with severe atypical endometrial hyperplasia preoperatively are at higher risk for endometrial cancer. The risk increases with the number of high-risk factors present in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.