ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effect of general anesthesia drugs on GFAP/Iba-1 expression: a meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intraoperative application of an antioxidant nanoparticle-hydrogel targeting microglia regulates neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker associated with astrocyte activation and plays a role in various pathologic processes, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Interacting boson approximation (Iba-1) is a marker protein for microglia, which are important in neuroinflammatory responses. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of general anesthetics on the expression of GFAP and Iba-1 in animal models. A meta-analysis was conducted using databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, and Web of Science. The quality of the selected publications was estimated using the SYRCLE guidelines to ensure credibility and consistency of the research. Continuous variables were measured using mean difference or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. Ten randomized controlled animal experiments were included in this analysis, utilizing different general anesthetics such as sevoflurane and propofol compared to untreated control groups. The results consistently demonstrated a significant increase in GFAP (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.72, P = 0.01) and Iba-1 (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.83, P = 0.03) expression in the general anesthetic-treated groups, suggesting a neuroinflammatory response induced by these agents. Assessment of publication bias revealed no significant bias in the included studies. This meta-analysis highlights the impact of general anesthetics on GFAP expression in animal models, emphasizing the importance of understanding the neuroinflammatory response associated with anesthesia administration. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular pathways and explore possible therapeutic interventions to mitigate adverse effects associated with anesthesia administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.