ArticleHeliyon2024
A nomogram incorporating Psoas muscle index for predicting tumor recurrence after liver transplantation: A retrospective study in an Eastern Asian population.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Tumor recurrence significantly affects the prognostic outcomes for liver cancer patients following liver transplantation. However, existing predictive models often neglect the inclusion of body composition indicators. Hence, this research aimed to investigate the significance of the psoas muscle index (PMI) in evaluating the post-transplant prognosis of liver cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on liver cancer patients who underwent liver transplantation surgery. Imaging analysis was performed using CT data to calculate PMI based on the left and right psoas muscle areas. Subsequently, the patients were categorized into PMI-Low and PMI-High groups using the established cut-off values. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the correlation between PMI and clinical outcomes, and a nomogram was constructed accordingly. Results: Among the 225 patients included in the analysis, the PMI-High group exhibited significantly improved overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P < 0.001) rates compared to the PMI-Low group. PMI exhibited a positive correlation with body mass index (R = 0.25, P < 0.001), but no significant correlations were observed. In the multivariate analysis, PMI (HR = 4.596, P < 0.001), MELD score (HR = 1.591, P = 0.038), and Hangzhou criteria (HR = 2.557, P < 0.001) emerged as significant predictors of DFS. The constructed nomogram, incorporating these predictors, demonstrated outstanding predictive performance. Decision curve analysis revealed the superiority of the nomogram over conventional methods. Conclusions: PMI serves as a valuable prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in liver cancer patients after liver transplantation. The established nomogram is pivotal in delivering personalized predictions of DFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.