ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Redefining YAP1 in small cell lung cancer: shifting from a dominant subtype marker to a favorable prognostic indicator.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Immunohistochemical Landscapes and Chemoimmunotherapy Outcomes of ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 in Pure Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Surgery versus radiotherapy after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Whole-section digital analysis of immune profiles in surgically resected small cell lung carcinoma and their associations with molecular subtypes.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Tumor Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Novel Immunohistochemical Profiling of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Correlations Between Tumor Subtypes and Immune Microenvironment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Molecular and transcription factor subtyping were recently introduced to identify patients with unique clinical features in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, its prognostic relevance is yet to be established. This study aims to investigate the clinical implications and prognostic significance of transcription factor subtyping in SCLC using immunohistochemistry. Methods: One hundred and ninety consecutive SCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Expression of ASCL1, NeuroD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 was assessed by immunohistochemical staining and applied to determine the transcription factor subtype of each case. Results: The association among transcription factors was not entirely mutually exclusive. YAP1 expression was the most significant prognostic indicator compared with other transcription factors or their related subtypes. Among patients with limited-stage disease (LD), complete response (CR) rates were 46.2% and 22.4% in the YAP1-positive and YAP1-negative groups, respectively. The median duration of response among patients who achieved CR was 64.8 and 36.4 months in the YAP1-positive and YAP1-negative groups, respectively (P=0.06). Median overall survival (OS) in LD was 35.6 and 16.9 months in the YAP1-positive and YAP1-negative groups, respectively (P=0.03). In extensive-stage disease (ED), the median OS was 11.3 months for the YAP1-positive group and 11 months for the YAP1-negative group (P=0.03). Conclusions: Positive expression of YAP1 can be associated with durable CR and favorable survival outcomes in patients with SCLC, especially in LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.