Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39263325›Full record

Article3 Biotech2024

Chinnasamy Ragavendran, Annadurai Govindaraj, Chinnaperumal Kamaraj, Devarajan Natarajan, Guilherme Malafaia, Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei, Mikhlid H Almutairi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chinnasamy RagavendranDepartment of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, 600 077 Tamil Nadu India.ORCID 0000-0002-7476-8907
Annadurai GovindarajNatural Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences, Periyar University, Salem, 636 011 Tamil Nadu India.
Chinnaperumal KamarajInterdisciplinary Institute of Indian System of Medicine (IIISM), Directorate of Research and Virtual Education, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRMIST), Tamil Nadu, Kattankulathur, Chennai 603203 India.
Devarajan NatarajanNatural Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences, Periyar University, Salem, 636 011 Tamil Nadu India.
Guilherme MalafaiaLaboratory of Toxicology Applied to the Environment, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí, GO Brazil.
Abdulwahed Fahad AlrefaeiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, 11451 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mikhlid H AlmutairiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, 11451 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic fungal molecules have the potential to be a cost-effective chemical source for developing eco-friendly disease-controlling pharmaceuticals that target mosquito-borne illnesses. The primary aims of the study were to identify the fungus Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04061-z.

Indexed as

Bio-pesticidesFusarium begoniaHistology studyPotato dextrose agarVector control

Identifiers

PMID39263325
PMCPMC11384672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.