Evidence mapPaperPMID 39264388Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2024

Comparison of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Satoshi Takahashi, Yusuke Sakaguchi, Nobuji Kouno, Ken Takasawa, Kenichi Ishizu, Yu Akagi, Rina Aoyama, Naoki Teraya, Amina Bolatkan, Norio Shinkai and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Colorectal cancer diagnosis method based on dynamic gland-aware and tissue soft-clustering].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Satoshi TakahashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yusuke SakaguchiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Nobuji KounoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ken TakasawaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kenichi IshizuDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yu AkagiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Rina AoyamaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Naoki TerayaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Amina BolatkanDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Norio ShinkaiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hidenori MachinoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kazuma KobayashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ken AsadaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masaaki KomatsuDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Syuzo KanekoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masashi SugiyamaRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, 103-0027, Japan.
Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. rhamamot@ncc.go.jp.

Funding

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan BRIDGEJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K16700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving field of medical image analysis utilizing artificial intelligence (AI), the selection of appropriate computational models is critical for accurate diagnosis and patient care. This literature review provides a comprehensive comparison of vision transformers (ViTs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), the two leading techniques in the field of deep learning in medical imaging. We conducted a survey systematically. Particular attention was given to the robustness, computational efficiency, scalability, and accuracy of these models in handling complex medical datasets. The review incorporates findings from 36 studies and indicates a collective trend that transformer-based models, particularly ViTs, exhibit significant potential in diverse medical imaging tasks, showcasing superior performance when contrasted with conventional CNN models. Additionally, it is evident that pre-training is important for transformer applications. We expect this work to help researchers and practitioners select the most appropriate model for specific medical image analysis tasks, accounting for the current state of the art and future trends in the field.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingHumansArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkMedical image analysisPrior learningVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID39264388
PMCPMC11393140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.